the strateegia platform is a social network for debates whose primary goal is to foster collaboration between individual, social, and artificial intelligences. it operates as a space where concepts are generated, discussed, and decisions are made with the aid of artificial intelligence to optimize performance. strateegia enhances decision-making processes in organizations, facilitates educational learning, and improves recruitment processes in the corporate world.
the platform allows for the creation of debate journeys, which are spaces where people form communities to discuss various topics, integrating their individual and social intelligences with artificial intelligences. the journeys are created by users and anyone with a strateegia account can create infinite debate journeys. it is possible to invite an unlimited number of people to the journeys, either by directly inviting registered users or by sharing a public link so that people can open a free account on strateegia and participate in the journey.
in summary, the strateegia platform is a social network for debates that aims to foster collaboration between different types of intelligences to optimize performance in various areas, such as organizational decisions, educational learning, and corporate recruitment.

the types of users present in debate journeys are: administrators, members, and mentors. administrators are the creators of the journey, responsible for initiating and organizing the debate. members are collaborators, people who actively participate in the journey, contributing their opinions and ideas. mentors act as co-creators, assisting administrators in guiding the debate, offering guidance, and suggestions. all types of users have access to the journey information, and can rename or delete the journey, as well as change the status of participants from mentors to collaborators and vice versa. therefore, the types of users present in debate journeys are administrators, members, and mentors, each with their respective roles and levels of participation in the debate process.

a journey on the strateegia platform is represented through maps of hexagonal points. these points are key elements that allow for the structuring and organization of activities within the journey. users with administrator and mentor profiles have the ability to add points to the journey map, choosing the desired type of point.

there are different types of points on the strateegia platform. conversation points are marked to gather participants in synchronized online or in-person meetings. notice points are used to record information that is sent to all journey participants via email. divergence points are where debates occur among journey participants, while convergence points are used for participants to declare their beliefs on the decisions proposed in the debates.

in addition to these types of points, the strateegia platform also uses special points based on artificial intelligence. starting points are where artificial intelligence is used to propose texts and questions on various topics, from the indication of administrators or mentors, to promote debates with the journey community. meanwhile, evaluation points are used to propose subjective questions or challenging situations for the community people to answer, with artificial intelligence also being used to evaluate people’s performance based on their answers.

artificial intelligence is used on the strateegia platform in various ways. firstly, it is used to propose texts and questions on various topics, based on the indications of administrators or mentors, to promote debates within the journey community. furthermore, artificial intelligence is also used to propose subjective questions or challenging situations for the community to answer, and to evaluate individuals’ performances based on their responses.

the platform also uses artificial intelligence to analyze the debates that occur at divergence or starting points. through this analysis, the platform can measure the maturity level of the debates, extract the main favorable and opposing positions to the questions discussed in the debates, summarize the debates, and indicate proposals that can be taken to convergence points automatically.

therefore, artificial intelligence on the strateegia platform plays a fundamental role in promoting debates, in evaluating participant performance, and in analyzing debates to extract relevant information.

starting points: these points are used by strateegia’s artificial intelligence to propose texts and questions on various topics, based on indications from administrators or mentors. this functionality aims to promote debates in the community journey, stimulating participation and the exchange of ideas among members. the starting points are a way to initiate discussions and generate reflections on the addressed topics.

evaluation points: in this functionality, strateegia’s artificial intelligence proposes subjective questions or challenging situations for the community participants to answer. from the members’ answers, the artificial intelligence can assess each person’s performance, using predetermined criteria. this functionality allows measuring knowledge, argumentative ability, and decision-making skills of the participants. moreover, the artificial intelligence can also summarize the debates that occur at points of divergence or starting points, identifying the main positions and proposals of the participants.

in summary, the starting points and evaluation points are tools that use artificial intelligence to stimulate debates, assess the performance of participants, and extract relevant information from the debates conducted on the strateegia platform.

artificial intelligence on the strateegia platform analyzes the debates that occur at points of divergence or starting points through different processes. it is capable of measuring the maturity level of the debates, extracting the main favorable and contrary positions to the addressed issues, as well as the main propositions of people in debates. furthermore, artificial intelligence can summarize the debates and indicate proposals that can automatically be taken to points of convergence.

the main functionalities of the strateegia platform are: the creation of debate journeys and the integration of individual, social, and artificial intelligence, promoting collaboration among users.

the platform allows users to create debate journeys where they can discuss various topics and integrate their individual and social intelligence with artificial intelligence. anyone with an account on strateegia can create infinite debate journeys and invite unlimited people to participate, either through direct invitations to registered users or by sharing a public link for people to open a free account and join the journey.

strateegia’s artificial intelligence is used to analyze debates occurring at points of divergence or starting points, measuring the maturity level of the debates, extracting the main favorable and contrary positions to the addressed issues, summarizing the debates, and indicating proposals that can be taken to points of convergence automatically.

people can be invited to participate in a debate journey on the strateegia platform in two ways. the first is through direct invitations to registered users. in this case, the journey administrators can send personalized invitations to specific people, inviting them to participate in the journey. the second way is by sharing a public link, allowing anyone to open a free account on strateegia and join the journey. this link can be disseminated through different channels, such as social networks, emails, or other means of communication.

there is no limitation on the number of people who can be invited to a debate journey. the administrators have the freedom to invite as many people as they wish, either through direct invitation or by sharing the public link. thus, the strateegia platform promotes collaboration between different individual, social, and artificial intelligences, allowing an unlimited number of participants to contribute with their ideas and opinions in the debates held during the journeys.

administrators and mentors have several actions they can perform in a debate journey on the strateegia platform. they are responsible for creating the journey and have access to all information related to it. moreover, they can invite people to participate in the journey, either through direct invitations to registered users or by sharing a public link for people to open a free account on strateegia and participate.

administrators and mentors also have the ability to rename or delete a journey, if necessary. in addition, they can change the status of participants, switching them from mentors to collaborators and vice versa.

in the debate journey, administrators and mentors can add points on the journey map, choosing the desired type of point. there are different types of points, such as conversation points, where synchronous online or in-person meetings are marked, notice points, where information is recorded that is sent to all participants by email, points of divergence, where debates occur among participants, and points of convergence, where participants declare their beliefs in the decisions proposed in the debates.

therefore, administrators and mentors play a fundamental role in creating, organizing, and conducting debate journeys on the strateegia platform.

the strateegia platform offers various benefits for teachers and students in face-to-face and online courses. firstly, the platform facilitates the learning process, allowing the creation of debate journeys where participants can discuss and debate various topics. this promotes collaboration among students, encouraging the exchange of ideas and the development of argumentative skills and critical thinking.

moreover, the platform uses artificial intelligence to propose texts and questions on different topics, enriching the course content and promoting deeper debates. the ai-based starting points encourage active participation of students, urging them to reflect on and respond to the proposed questions.

the platform also allows teachers to evaluate student performance through evaluation points, where artificial intelligence is used to propose subjective questions or challenging situations. this enables a more comprehensive and individualized evaluation, assisting in tracking students’ progress.

in summary, the use of the strateegia platform by teachers and students in face-to-face and online courses provides benefits such as promoting collaboration, stimulating critical thinking, enriching course content, and a more comprehensive and individualized evaluation.

the strateegia platform offers various benefits for managers and team leaders. firstly, it promotes collaboration between individual, social, and artificial intelligence, allowing managers and leaders to have access to different perspectives and ideas for decision-making. this optimizes the decision-making process in organizations, enabling the consideration of different points of view.

furthermore, the platform facilitates educational learning, allowing managers and leaders to create debate journeys on various topics. these journeys function as spaces where people form communities to debate and exchange knowledge. with the participation of artificial intelligence, it is possible to enhance the learning process and obtain valuable insights.

another benefit is the improvement in recruitment processes in the corporate world. the platform allows the creation of debate journeys on recruitment-related topics, facilitating interaction between managers, leaders, and candidates. this eases the identification of talents and the selection of professionals more suitable for the available vacancies.

in summary, the use of the strateegia platform by managers and team leaders provides benefits such as optimizing the decision-making process, facilitating educational learning, and improving recruitment processes.

firstly, the strateegia platform promotes collaboration between individual, social, and artificial intelligences. this means that designers and innovation leaders can connect and exchange ideas with other professionals, both from the same field and different ones, which can enrich the creative process and bring new perspectives.

furthermore, the platform allows for the creation of debate journeys, where participants can discuss various themes. these journeys can be created by anyone with a strateegia account, meaning that designers and innovation leaders have the possibility to create specific journeys to debate issues related to their field of work.

the platform also uses special points based on artificial intelligence, such as starting points and evaluation points. these points can be used to foster debates with the journey community and assess people’s performance based on their responses. this can be especially useful for designers and innovation leaders as it allows for the exchange of ideas and evaluation of the presented proposals.

in summary, the use of the strateegia platform by designers and innovation leaders can bring benefits such as collaboration with other professionals, the creation of specific debate journeys, and the use of special points based on artificial intelligence to foster discussions and evaluate proposals.

strateegia requires an SSL/TLS certificate to function, which is supported by most modern operating systems, including, but not limited to:

Windows: Version 7 and later.

macOS: Recent versions, typically the last three major releases.

Linux: Ubuntu, Debian, Fedora, etc., preferably recent versions.

Unix and BSD variants: FreeBSD, OpenBSD, etc.

Mobile operating systems: Android and iOS, generally supported in the most recent versions.

The specific compatibility with SSL/TLS may vary depending on the exact version of your operating system and the security updates applied. To ensure maximum security and ongoing compatibility, we recommend regular updates of the operating system.

the quality of debate in any sphere, whether academic, business, or political, can be considered a function composed of four main factors: diversity, breadth, quality, and depth of contributions. the proposed equation suggests that the quality of the debate is directly proportional to each of these factors, and an increase in any one of them results in a proportional increase in the overall quality of the debate. below, each of these factors will be expanded upon with hypothetical examples to better elucidate their influence on the quality of debate.

diversity refers to the variety of participants involved in the debate and the multiplicity of their viewpoints. a debate is enriched when it brings together participants with different experiences, backgrounds, and perspectives. for instance, in a discussion about educational policies, the inclusion of teachers, students, administrators, parents, and education experts from diverse contexts and geographical regions would facilitate a richer and more varied exchange of opinions. this interweaving of diverse perspectives favors the emergence of more innovative and comprehensive solutions to the issue at hand.

breadth pertains to the volume and variety of contributions within the debate. a broad debate is one where there is a large number of interventions, questions, and responses among the participants. taking the previous example, breadth would be achieved if, in addition to having a diversity of participants, each one actively contributed with questions and responses, challenging and building upon the placements of others.

quality refers to the substance and substantiation of the contributions made by the participants. a high-quality contribution is one that is well-founded, based on concrete data, research, and experiments, and not merely on unfounded opinions or speculation. for example, a teacher who supports their argumentation about teaching methods with data from empirical research and results of classroom experiments would contribute significantly to elevating the quality of the debate.

depth relates to the level of reflection and critical analysis of the participants regarding the contributions of others. a deep debate is one where participants not only listen to or read the contributions of others but carefully analyze them, considering their implications on various levels. returning to the example of educational policy, depth would be achieved if participants applied the 5w principle (who, what, where, when, why) to deeply analyze the proposals, questioning who will be affected, what will be implemented, where, when, and why it is the best option.

in summary, a high-quality debate is one that is characterized by the diversity of its participants and opinions, by the breadth of contributions and interactions among them, by the quality and substantiation of each intervention, and by the depth of critical analysis. the combination of these factors promotes a rich and constructive exchange of ideas, leading to more robust and innovative solutions to the problems under discussion.

diversity refers to the variety of participants involved in the debate and the multiplicity of their viewpoints. a debate is enriched when it brings together participants with different experiences, backgrounds, and perspectives. for instance, in a discussion about educational policies, the inclusion of teachers, students, administrators, parents, and education experts from diverse contexts and geographical regions would facilitate a richer and more varied exchange of opinions. this interweaving of diverse perspectives favors the emergence of more innovative and comprehensive solutions to the issue at hand.

breadth pertains to the volume and variety of contributions within the debate. a broad debate is one where there is a large number of interventions, questions, and responses among the participants. taking the previous example, breadth would be achieved if, in addition to having a diversity of participants, each one actively contributed with questions and responses, challenging and building upon the placements of others.

quality refers to the substance and substantiation of the contributions made by the participants. a high-quality contribution is one that is well-founded, based on concrete data, research, and experiments, and not merely on unfounded opinions or speculation. for example, a teacher who supports their argumentation about teaching methods with data from empirical research and results of classroom experiments would contribute significantly to elevating the quality of the debate.

depth relates to the level of reflection and critical analysis of the participants regarding the contributions of others. a deep debate is one where participants not only listen to or read the contributions of others but carefully analyze them, considering their implications on various levels. returning to the example of educational policy, depth would be achieved if participants applied the 5w principle (who, what, where, when, why) to deeply analyze the proposals, questioning who will be affected, what will be implemented, where, when, and why it is the best option.

in summary, a high-quality debate is one that is characterized by the diversity of its participants and opinions, by the breadth of contributions and interactions among them, by the quality and substantiation of each intervention, and by the depth of critical analysis. the combination of these factors promotes a rich and constructive exchange of ideas, leading to more robust and innovative solutions to the problems under discussion.